ABIT VH6T AUDIO CONTROLLER DRIVER DOWNLOAD

0 Comment

I mean, I have seen in the past people posting BS not in this forum and after they where getting ridiculed from many members, they where throwing degrees all over the place in a final effort to defend themselves. That’s why you always waited for the A versions. There was also the CPU cache latency issue with the , but since it was designed to run socket chips with on die cache, it’s not really an issue. The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, where the memory bandwidth. Both of those statements do not jive with real world testing and benchmarks of the time.

Uploader: Nirg
Date Added: 14 November 2005
File Size: 65.7 Mb
Operating Systems: Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X
Downloads: 60891
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]

I managed to clock one of my 1.

Post benchmarks to prove you claims. I mean, I have seen in the past people posting BS not in this forum and after they where getting ridiculed from many members, they where throwing degrees all over the place in a final effort to defend themselves. It was at that point my opinion vht6 perspective about VIA chipsets changed.

I don’t have a time machine. There was also the CPU cache latency issue with thebut since it was designed to run socket chips with on xbit cache, it’s not really an issue. Also you have to realize that degrees and years of experience means nothing to the other person. The big problem with VIA chipsets, especially the first revisions, where the memory bandwidth.

Last Drivers  M1212NF SCAN DRIVER

ABIT Driver – free motherboard driver downlod

While the older chips were built on the 28 nm process, the KX series will be built on the newer 16 nm process, feature 4 or 8 CPU cores clocked at speeds of up to 3. But if that’s the reason VIA has been allowed to continue, that puts VIA in a crappy position with regards to potentially putting out truly vht6 products. You can’t forget that kind of disappointment. Check out my threads on Vogons marvin section – I benchmarked most slot 1 and socket chipsets last summer.

In any case Apollo was much worst than BX. audjo

VIA was great as long as there was no competition to show it’s chipsets weaknesses in performance. I was under the opinion, like yours, and a friend benchmarked VIA vs Intel based mobo’s right in front of me. SiS was beating controler first versions, with chipsets like the excellent in memory performance. These are full-fledged SoCs, which completely integrate the chipset including the southrbidge. It is by no means a fast chipset unless you compare it with socket 7 controllre.

Look, don’t get me wrong. Granted, VIA isn’t exactly a significant competitor. It is in fact the slowest of all socket chipsets. I just knew someone will say VIA is Cyrix These chips could realistically be touted as low-cost alternatives to Intel “Gemini Lake” SoCs, although Zhaoxin is making bold claims about its performance nearing that of AMD Ryzen processors. I know what I have seen back then.

Last Drivers  AAR 2410SA DRIVER DOWNLOAD

VIA and Zhaoxin have been co-developing the ZX family of x86 processors for rollout inand abi least on paper, the chips appear to have the chops to take on Intel’s “Gemini Lake” SoCs. With a fast AGP 4x card, the performs horribly. On the other hand there where more than one chipsets, but I don’t remember how much better BX was compared to the other versions.

Sunday, January 1st We are completely unknown and degrees, experiences and system specs, convince no one. Sorry, but I know what I have seen back then. Can you prove your findings, or those university degrees are considered proof of everything you post?

Anyway, prove your claims before calling my benchmarks wrong.

360 controller on vista

That’s why you always waited for the A versions. Don’t get me wrong. Both of those statements do not jive with real world testing and benchmarks of the time. So, don’t be so sure. You really don’t have to convince everyone.