All but two of the fonts we test with were easily readable at 4 points. The one important flaw in the output is visible dithering that creates a banding effect in some images. Best smartphones to gift this Diwali These are the best phones that you should consider buying during this More important, on 10 of the 13 tests in the suite, the ML was tied with or just behind the Brother printer by no more than 2 seconds, which isn’t enough to notice under normal circumstances. Ample paper handing for a personal printer, with default page capacity and a maximum of pages. Text output is excellent.
|Date Added:||15 April 2004|
|File Size:||56.64 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Graphics quality is just short of good, which is typical for monochrome laser printers. As with some graphic output, the photos suffer from a banding effect.
Personal monochrome lasers aren’t what they ml2250 to be, and that’s good. And the package as a whole offers a highly attractive mix of performance, output quality, paper handling, and price.
But the ppm engine will churn out pages faster than some network printers and deliver respectable output quality as well. More laser printer reviews: Most important, the ML output quality overall is better than for most monochrome laser printers.
Ample paper handing for a personal printer, with default page capacity and a maximum of pages.
Even better, you can boost the sheet standard paper capacity to a maximum of sheets, which is plenty for personal use. Photo output rates as fair, which is at the low end for monochrome lasers but still within the expected range.
Become a fan of PCMag. Best smartphones to gift this Diwali These are the best phones that you should consider buying during this Twitter testing button to switch between chronological and algorithmic timelines The test is currently live for some iOS users.
Although acceptable for newsletters and the like, photo quality is at the low end for inexpensive monochrome lasers. His more than 30 years of experience in writing about science and technology includes a more than year concentration on You won’t want to print photos for framing, but the quality is good enough for newsletters and similar output, which is really all you should expect from a monochrome laser printer.
David is also an expert in imaging technologies including printers, monitors, large-screen displays, projectors, scanners, and digital camerasstorage both magnetic and opticaland word processing. More important, on 10 of the 13 tests in the suite, the ML was tied with or just behind the Brother printer by no more than 2 seconds, which isn’t enough to notice under normal circumstances. David Stone The Best Printers of Text output is excellent. David Stone sasung an award-winning freelance writer and computer industry consultant.
The Samsung Sansung is for heavy-duty personal use. He is a recognized expert on printers, well known within the industry, and has been a judge for the Hewlett-Packard HP Invent Awards.
It was more than 2 seconds slower on remaining tests, but still not enough to matter much. Although a confirmed generalist, with writing credits on subjects as varied as ape language experiments, politics, quantum physics, and an overview of a top company in the gaming industry.
The ML is not the fastest personal laser we’ve tested, but it’s not far off the mark, with a total time on our business applications suite of 8 minutes 9 seconds using QualityLogic’s testing software and equipment, www.
The one important flaw in the output is visible dithering that creates a banding effect samsun some images. About the Author M.
The remaining two are highly stylized and often don’t print well, yet they were easily readable at 6 points for one and 8 points for the other. It’s faster than most personal monochrome lasers, text output is among the best we’ve seen, and the page maximum capacity is more than enough for one person or even for sharing the printer in a samsumg office.
All but two of the fonts we test with were easily readable at 4 points.